<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Larkhill Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larkhilltalk.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larkhilltalk.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on M83 &#8211; Hurry Up, We&#8217;re Dreaming by What are some good snowboarding songs to listen to while riding? &#124; Snow Boarding Info</title>
		<link>http://www.larkhilltalk.com/2011/09/m83/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>What are some good snowboarding songs to listen to while riding? &#124; Snow Boarding Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larkhilltalk.com/?p=1049#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] 182 Family Force 5-face down Family Force 5-luv addict i like rap remixes too they get me pumpedI&#039;m heading up to the mountain this weekend, and want some ideas on your best snowboarding music. Wh...lothes off Kayne west-touch the sky Kayne west-good life mount sims-how we do any Blink 182 Family [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 182 Family Force 5-face down Family Force 5-luv addict i like rap remixes too they get me pumpedI&#039;m heading up to the mountain this weekend, and want some ideas on your best snowboarding music. Wh&#8230;lothes off Kayne west-touch the sky Kayne west-good life mount sims-how we do any Blink 182 Family [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fukushima should not put us off nuclear power by Michael Vinegrad</title>
		<link>http://www.larkhilltalk.com/2011/03/nuclearpower/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vinegrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larkhilltalk.com/?p=917#comment-113</guid>
		<description>The stats on waste volumes were from ‘Lovelock, James (2006). The Revenge of Gaia’. James Lovelock is a pretty well respected scientist and environmentalist (but a rare one who backs nuclear).

I looked into the amount of uranium that is available and the carbon cost of mining it. The Sustainable Development Commission (who are not really pro nuclear) concluded in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/SDC-NuclearPosition-2006.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this paper&lt;/a&gt; that there are no concerns about long term access to sufficient uranium. The World Nuclear Association &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf100.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;states here&lt;/a&gt; that including mining and refining uranium it only uses 1.7% of the energy it produces. (But I can&#039;t say if this figure has been independently verified). 

I don’t think fission is the permanent solution. Even if we went down that route uranium would eventually run out, just like oil is. But I think it is a key part of getting us off coal / oil until eventually we discover how to initiate nuclear fusion. That should be all the clean energy we will ever need. But I only think we will get there if fission is developed / invested in due to the resulting advancements in nuclear technology.

It’s a really tricky one. It feels really weird to support nuclear, but I think its a big part of what we need to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stats on waste volumes were from ‘Lovelock, James (2006). The Revenge of Gaia’. James Lovelock is a pretty well respected scientist and environmentalist (but a rare one who backs nuclear).</p>
<p>I looked into the amount of uranium that is available and the carbon cost of mining it. The Sustainable Development Commission (who are not really pro nuclear) concluded in <a href="http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/SDC-NuclearPosition-2006.pdf" rel="nofollow">this paper</a> that there are no concerns about long term access to sufficient uranium. The World Nuclear Association <a href="http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf100.html" rel="nofollow">states here</a> that including mining and refining uranium it only uses 1.7% of the energy it produces. (But I can&#8217;t say if this figure has been independently verified). </p>
<p>I don’t think fission is the permanent solution. Even if we went down that route uranium would eventually run out, just like oil is. But I think it is a key part of getting us off coal / oil until eventually we discover how to initiate nuclear fusion. That should be all the clean energy we will ever need. But I only think we will get there if fission is developed / invested in due to the resulting advancements in nuclear technology.</p>
<p>It’s a really tricky one. It feels really weird to support nuclear, but I think its a big part of what we need to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fukushima should not put us off nuclear power by daftfletcher</title>
		<link>http://www.larkhilltalk.com/2011/03/nuclearpower/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>daftfletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larkhilltalk.com/?p=917#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Good points about the media attention but can you reference your stats on nuclear waste volumes? Also worth looking up figures for carbon emitted refining fuel for nuclear which is very high, plus how much energy could be produced by the finite reserves of the incredibly rare uranium left on Earth and whether it really represents a credible global energy source or just a way for rich nations to clear their consciences. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points about the media attention but can you reference your stats on nuclear waste volumes? Also worth looking up figures for carbon emitted refining fuel for nuclear which is very high, plus how much energy could be produced by the finite reserves of the incredibly rare uranium left on Earth and whether it really represents a credible global energy source or just a way for rich nations to clear their consciences. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The horror of Deepwater by Michael Vinegrad</title>
		<link>http://www.larkhilltalk.com/2010/06/deepwaterspill/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vinegrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larkhilltalk.com/?p=370#comment-108</guid>
		<description>http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00vy7f9/hd/Stephen_Fry_and_the_Great_American_Oil_Spill/

Interesting programme by Stephen Fry on the clean up operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00vy7f9/hd/Stephen_Fry_and_the_Great_American_Oil_Spill/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00vy7f9/hd/Stephen_Fry_and_the_Great_American_Oil_Spill/</a></p>
<p>Interesting programme by Stephen Fry on the clean up operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark days for cricket by Michael Vinegrad</title>
		<link>http://www.larkhilltalk.com/2010/09/darkdaysforcricket/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vinegrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larkhilltalk.com/?p=759#comment-106</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K55ws_ddI0k ...and this song nicely sums up the situation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K55ws_ddI0k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K55ws_ddI0k</a> &#8230;and this song nicely sums up the situation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

